Jumping from your phone

Most people who ask this question are wanting to do more with taking pictures than they can do with a phone camera. Even the latest and greatest phone camera, with all of it’s resolution and fancy software and tricks, is inferior to a modern DSLR or mirrorless camera. When it comes right down to it, the physical size of a phone camera sensor is a limiting factor. Having the option of changing the optics (lenses) is one of the most common features that people want and you just can’t put that in a phone. By moving to a dedicated camera system you will see a noticeable improvement in image quality and gain flexibility that you just don't get from a phone.

WHERE TO START?
One of the first questions you should be asking yourself is: What is it that I want to do? Is there a limitation with my current camera, or, is there something else keeping me from what I want to achieve? If you can’t answer these questions, you should probably just stop here until you can. Your camera is likely to sit around collecting dust. These questions will also help answer the question of what gear you want. Note, I’ve said want in this paragraph, not need. There will be times where you need a specific feature to get a desired result, but most of the time it’s more like “it would be adventagous to have" a certain feature or gadget. (Or if you're like me, you just like shiny new toys.) The best news is that you don’t need to have a huge budget to make the jump.

Fancier Model?

Should I buy a fancier model?

Post-Processing

What about post-processing?

New vs. Used

Should I buy a fancier model? Post-processing? New vs. used gear? Brands and technologies.

Should I buy a fanicer model?

My default answer to this is no. Having a fancier car doesn’t make you a better driver. A better oven doesn’t make a better cake. A more advanced camera doesn’t take better (more interesting) photos. Having more features adds another layer of complexity to an already complex subject. In my experience having extras can be distracting to the creative process. Having a technically better photo doesn’t make me want to look at it more. Composition, perspective and personal style are what make photos interesting and what makes me want to look at them. When it comes to gear, lenses will get you far more bang for the buck than any camera body. The exception to this is if there is a specific feature you KNOW you will use. If there is, then consider spending the extra money. 

An example would be time lapse. During a recent discussion talking about two different beginner cameras, I recommended the person stay with the less expensive model. That was until they mentioned in a comment that time lapse was something they were interested in. In this case, it made more sense to pay the extra $200 to get this feature (and several others) built into the body rather than needing to buy an accessory later on. 

One last thought here before we move on. Photographers have been taking amazing photos since the 1800’s. They didn’t have any of the modern conveniences that we have today. It’s about the photographer not the gear.

Image by me. Nikon D5600, AF-P 18-55

Image by me. Nikon Z5, Samyang 14mm f/2.8

Post-Processing

Along the lines of getting more interesting (fancier) pictures, I want to mention post-processing. This question is one of many that often provokes a more emotional debate. One side says something to the effect of “photoshop made that picture, not you”. The other side says post is just another part of the creative process. Both answers are right.

One of the rules of photography that you’ll see talked about frequently is “get it right in the camera”. This is good advice and you should do your best to get it right in the camera. However, there’s something that I have started to notice more frequently in photography. A huge part of the wow factor in many modern photographs comes from post-processing. It’s not so much the camera, the lens or even the photograph as it is the photographer's personal style brought out by their post process. To me this makes sense and I believe it is the natural evolution of the art. When you look back at film photography, most noteworthy photographers insisted on developing their own film. That was an important part of their style and their personal creative signature. But, even with amazing post processing software and skills, the more you get right in the camera, the better the results. 

New vs. Used

This is also a really common question, and again this is one where personal preference plays a bigger role. I prefer to buy my bodies new and buy my lenses used. But, there’s nothing wrong with used bodies or new lenses. Any camera body that’s been released in the last 5-7 years or so is going to be very capable and produce beautiful results. If you are just starting out, I suggest caution be taken when buying used gear from classified type ads. If you have a “photo friend” get their opinion on the gear. If not, the biggest thing is to look for signs that the gear has been dropped. Unfortunately it doesn't take a big drop to cause damage to the delicate parts of a camera or lens. There are also several reputable used gear dealers online that offer a warranty with their gear. I have had good experiences with this. A good place to get more information on resellers is the AskPhotography subreddit.

A Nikon specific note here. With Nikon’s consumer cameras, if you go back much further than 5 years, you can run into compatibility issues with lenses and you’re getting far lower resolution sensors. Specifically some of the older cameras aren’t compatible with the most recent lenses and likely won’t be with future lenses.

Image by me. Nikon D7500, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8